Additional Information

किस कंपनी ने भारत का पहला रुपया-आधारित क्रिप्टो रुपया इंडेक्स (CRE8) लॉन्च किया है?

Key Points

  • भारत की सबसे बड़ी क्रिप्टो निवेश ऐप, कॉइनस्विच, ने 2 जून 2022 को क्रिप्टो रुपया इंडेक्स (CRE8) लॉन्च किया।
  • रुपया-आधारित क्रिप्टो बाजार के प्रदर्शन को मापने के लिए यह देश का पहला बेंचमार्क इंडेक्स है।
  • CRE8 उन आठ क्रिप्टो परिसंपत्तियों के प्रदर्शन को ट्रैक करेगा, जो भारतीय रुपये में ट्रेड किए गए क्रिप्टो के कुल बाजार पूंजीकरण का 85% से अधिक का प्रतिनिधित्व करते हैं।

Additional Information

  • कॉइनबेस प्रतिष्ठित फॉर्च्यून 500 सूची में प्रवेश करने वाली पहली क्रिप्टो फर्म बन गई है।
  • रिटेल दिग्गज वॉलमार्ट लगातार 10वें साल रैंकिंग में सबसे इनर सर्कल ट्रेडर कौन है? ऊपर है, उसके बाद अमेजन और ऐप्पल का स्थान है।
  • फॉर्च्यून 500:
    • फॉर्च्यून 500 फॉर्च्यून पत्रिका द्वारा प्रकाशित एक वार्षिक सूची है जो अपने संबंधित वित्तीय वर्षों के लिए कुल राजस्व के हिसाब से संयुक्त राज्य अमेरिका के 500 सबसे बड़े निगमों को रैंक देती है।
    • फॉर्च्यून 500 की अवधारणा एक फॉर्च्यून संपादक एडगर पी. स्मिथ द्वारा बनाई गई थी, और पहली सूची 1955 में प्रकाशित हुई थी।
    • फॉर्च्यून पत्रिका ने 1994 में सेवा कंपनियों को शामिल करने के लिए अपनी कार्यप्रणाली में बदलाव किया।
    • 2020 में, फॉर्च्यून इनर सर्कल ट्रेडर कौन है? 500 कंपनियां संयुक्त राज्य के सकल घरेलू उत्पाद के लगभग दो-तिहाई का प्रतिनिधित्व करती हैं।

    Share on Whatsapp

    Last updated on Nov 24, 2022

    SSC Stenographer Tentative Answer Key released on 24th November 2022. This is for the CBE held on 17th & 18th November 2022. Candidates can submit any objections against the same by 28th November 2022. The Skill Test (2022 cycle) will be held on 15th and 16th February 2023. Candidates could apply for the said post till 5th September 2022. The SSC Stenographer Salary for the appointed candidates will be in the pay scale of INR 5200 - INR 34,800.

    Statutes Must Be Interpreted In A Just, Reasonable And Sensible Manner: Supreme Court

    Statutes Must Be Interpreted In A Just, Reasonable And Sensible Manner: Supreme Court

    A statute must be interpreted in a just, reasonable and sensible manner, the Supreme Court observed while dismissing Special Leave Petition against a Rajasthan High Court judgment.In this case, the contention of the SLP petitioner [Commercial Taxes Officer] was that a single transaction of purchase of a motor vehicle does not bring a person within the definition of "Casual.

    A statute must be interpreted in a just, reasonable and sensible manner, the Supreme Court observed while dismissing Special Leave Petition against a Rajasthan High Court judgment.

    In this case, the contention of the SLP petitioner [ Commercial Taxes Officer] was that a single transaction of purchase of a motor vehicle does not bring a person within the definition इनर सर्कल ट्रेडर कौन है? of "Casual Trader" under Rajasthan Tax on Entry of Motor Vehicle into Local Areas Act 1988. According to it, "Casual Trader" envisages occasional transactions of business involving buying and selling of goods and therefore plurality of transactions is a condition precedent for treating a trader as a "Casual Trader". The contention therefore was that since there was only a single transaction in this case, the assessee could not be termed as a 'casual trader'. The High Court had upheld the Appellate Authority order which set aside the Assessment Order holding that the assessee was a "Casual Trader" and, therefore, the limitation for passing an Assessment Order against him was only 2 years from the date of the transaction.

    The Legislature could not, possibly, have intended that a person making 2 or 3 transactions should be treated as a "Casual Trader", but a person making only one transaction should be treated at par with regular traders, the bench comprising Justices Indira Banerjee and Sanjiv Khanna said disagreeing with the petitioner's contentions.

    The court noted that the definition of casual trader in the Act makes it clear that a person with occasional transactions of buying/selling are to be treated as casual traders, for whom a shorter time limit for assessment has been imposed under Section 10B(iii) read with Section 10A of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act 1954.

    Referring to observations made by इनर सर्कल ट्रेडर कौन है? Justice Venkatarama Aiyar in Tirath Singh v. Bachittar Singh AIR 1955 SC 830, the bench observed:

    It is well settled that in construing a statutory provision, words in the singular are to include the plural and vice versa, unless repugnant to the context in which the expression has been used, as provided in Section 13(2) of the General Clauses Act, 1897 and provisions identical thereto in State enactments pertaining to General Clauses. ..The Court must interpret a statute in a manner which is just, reasonable and sensible. If the grammatical construction leads to some absurdity or some repugnancy or inconsistency with the legislative intent, as may be deduced by reading the provisions of the statute as a whole, the grammatical construction may be departed from to avoid anomaly, absurdity or inconsistency.

    Following observations made in Tirath Singh are quoted in the judgment:

    "Where the language of a statute, in its ordinary meaning and grammatical construction, leads to a manifest contradiction of the apparent purpose of the enactment, or to some inconvenience or absurdity, hardship or injustice, presumably not intended, a construction may be put upon it which modifies the meaning of the words, and even the structure of the sentence."

    Observing thus, the bench dismissed the SLP.

    Case: Commercial Taxes Officer, Circle-B, Bharatpur vs. M/s Bhagat Singh [Special Leave Petition (C) No.15870/2020]

रेटिंग: 4.25
अधिकतम अंक: 5
न्यूनतम अंक: 1
मतदाताओं की संख्या: 862